a demonstration of c.a.u.s.a.l.
reality is governed by causality—creator over creation
mechanical defeats arbitrary. counting defeats decree. real defeats fiat-or we abandon reason itself.[separate and equal station]
[my private property]{our coequal commons}[your private property]
{ordinary use by allodial right-extraordinary use by article one section eight indirect tax}
mutually secured|none may breachnone are born with the authority to breach. intraspecies predation is innately self-liquidating ruin; cannibal predator pack hunting logic is not viable jurisdictional machinery.the self rules the self birth-til-death; life's liberty is manifested through worldly property; force can destroy life, strength can destroy liberty, power can destroy property, but because they are consubstantial, none can disjoin one from another."and this...we have reason to expect when he reflects that he is no more than the chief officer of the people, appointed by the laws, and circumscribed with definite powers, to assist in working the great machine of government, erected for their use, and consequently subject to their superintendence...kings are the servants, not the proprietors of the people."[universal jurisdiction construction-abc]
every jurisdiction world-wide is composed of three stations and three parties:
the principal sovereign, its agent government, and its subjects.
all rights and privileges are mechanically produced by this structure.[a-the sovereign and its properties, principal];
|king-legislature-faction-theocracy asserting breach power| v |the equal fellow citizens and joint tenants|{b-the sovereign’s government instituted to secure the sovereign’s properties, agent};
|legally empowered to breach and confiscate| v |agent trustees that facilitate mutual security against breach and confiscation|{c-the sovereign’s subjects}
|all persons and properties within the borders| v |all properties created jointly or permitted to the coequal jurisdiction|
---[rights and privileges mechanics] [r.p.m.]
the relationship of a party to the property determines whether an action is a right or a privilege.[property] one's mind, body, soul, deliberations, and actions as well as the tangible and intangible products of one's labors, plus one's coequal claim to the commons of their home jurisdiction, including that of principal based, non-attribute, non-arbitrary separate and equal naturally productive mechanical governance.[ownership|sovereignty|dominion] the ultimate authority to control [possess-use-exclude-dispose] without breaching another. upstream of another's recognition.[rights|possess-use-exclude-dispose one's own property] self-authorized acts with one’s own property, both individual and joint; [seised] simultaneous possession and ownership.{privileges|possess-use-exclude-dispose another's property} owner-permitted acts with owner’s property.aka {second class rights}, rights bestowed by another)eg. the owner of property has the right to grant or otherwise confer a privilege to a user under the condition of non-breach. the user/agent is subject to the rules of the owner and the property rights of others.“true law is right reason in agreement with nature; it is of universal application, unchanging and everlasting; it summons to duty by its commands, and averts from wrongdoing by its prohibitions." de republica —cicero 52BC"no man shall be disseised, that is, put out of seison, or dispossessed of his free-hold, that is, lands, or livelihood, or of his liberties, or free customes...unlesse it be by the lawfull judgement, that is, verdict of his equals." —coke 1642“a man’s right to his own life, and to the use of his own limbs, is so inalienable, that he cannot even by his own consent, make them the property of another.”— hutcheson a system of moral philosophy (1755)"sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas-use your own property in such a way as not to injure that of others—every person ought so to use his property as not to injure his neighbors." —blackstone 1765 <> kent 1826“it is certainly unlawful to make inroads upon others, unprovoked, and take away their liberty by no better right than superior power.” — john witherspoon, lectures on moral philosophy (1768)"[the abolition of domestic slavery is the great object of desire in those colonies, where it was unhappily introduced in their infant state]
[our saxon ancestors held their lands, as they did their personal property, in absolute dominion, disencumbered with any superior, answering nearly to the nature of those possessions which the feudalists term allodial]
..under which all lands were held in absolute right. these, therefore, still form the basis, or ground-work, of the common law, to prevail wheresoever the exceptions have not taken place.]"[let no act be passed by any one legislature which may infringe on the rights and liberties of another]the god who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time; the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them.” —a summary view of the rights of british america jefferson 1774“that the inhabitants of the english colonies in north-america, by the immutable laws of nature, the principles of the english constitution, and the several charters or compacts, have the following rights:resolved, n.c.d. 1. that they are entitled to life, liberty and property: and they have never ceded to any foreign power whatever, a right to dispose of either without their consent.resolved, n.c.d. 2. that our ancestors, who first settled these colonies, were at the time of their emigration from the mother country, entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities of free and natural- born subjects, within the realm of england.resolved, n.c.d. 3. that by such emigration they by no means forfeited, surrendered, or lost any of those rights, but that they were, and their descendants now are, entitled to the exercise and enjoyment of all such of them, as their local and other circumstances enable them to exercise and enjoy.resolved, 4. that the foundation of english liberty, and of all free government, is a right in the people to participate in their legislative council:resolved, n.c.d. 5. that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of england [saxon allodial], and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage, according to the course of that law. —declaration and resolves of the first continental congress (1774)"…to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and nature’s god entitle…we hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights…that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men…and for the support of this declaration…
we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.”
—the unanimous declaration of the thirteen united states of america (1776)"i set out on this ground which i suppose to be self evident, 'that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living...what is true of every member of the society individually, is true of them all collectively, since the rights of the whole can be no more than the sum of the rights of the individuals. the group inherits nothing the individuals don’t own first." — jefferson 1789"to take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers [security of property] of congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.it would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the united states; and, as they would be the sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please."— jefferson 1791[saxon allodial] symmetrical, non- contradictory, private and joint property protection systems architecture; constant, horizontal, non-hierarchal, universally applicable, equally weighted, common american law-that none may breach.loper bright enterprises et al. v raimondo, secretary of commerce, et al;
thank you scotus